论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨扑热息痛灌肠和口服两种给药途径治疗小儿发热的临床效果。方法 60例发热患儿,按照给药途径的不同分为对照组和观察组,各30例,在常规治疗基础上对照组患儿采用口服给药法,观察组患儿采用灌肠给药法,对两组退热时间及退热效果进行比较分析,同时观察两组患儿的不良反应。结果观察组的降温起效时间、降温总有效率及不良反应均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用扑热息痛灌肠的给药方式操作简便,退热迅速,效果显著,不良反应小,安全有效,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of acetaminophen enema and oral administration on fever in children. Methods Sixty children with fever were divided into the control group and the observation group according to the route of administration. Each group received 30 cases. The control group received oral administration, while the observation group received the enema administration. The two groups of antipyretic time and antipyretic effect were compared, while observing the two groups of children with adverse reactions. Results The observation group’s time of onset of cooling, the total effective rate of cooling and adverse reactions were better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The administration mode of paracetamol enema is simple and convenient, with rapid fever, remarkable effect, small adverse reaction, safe and effective, and worthy of clinical application.