论文部分内容阅读
地方综合年鉴稿和地方志资料年报同属地方志领域,在报送内容、形式,组织方式上存在很多交叉之处,而成为比较的对象。本文分析当前关于两者关系的“年鉴取代年报说”“年鉴年报并行说”“年报取代年鉴说”三种误解。这三种误解均强调了两者的差别,而忽略了其共性。年报应与年鉴稿比较,而非年鉴。并从文本和工作方式两个方面比较了年鉴稿和年报的异同。两者发展的趋向不可偏废,应该通过整合协调发展,整合的前提是不破坏两者的独立性,整合的措施包括人员整合、工作整合。
The annual comprehensive annual review draft and the annual report of local history information belong to the same field of local history. There are many intersections in the content, form and organization of submission, and become the object of comparison. This article analyzes the three current misunderstandings about the current relationship between the two: the annual report replaces the annual report and the annual report said that the annual report replaces the yearbook. All three misunderstandings emphasize the difference between the two, ignoring their commonalities. The annual report should be compared with the annual draft, not the yearbook. And compares the similarities and differences between the annual report and the annual report from two aspects of texts and working methods. The trend of development of both should not be neglected, and should be coordinated and developed through integration. The premise of integration is not to undermine the independence of the two. The integrated measures include personnel integration and job integration.