扩张型心肌病患者心率加速力和减速力变化的临床意义

来源 :临床心血管病杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:huanguo12819
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者心率加速力(AC)和减速力(DC)变化的临床意义。方法:选择43例DCM患者(DCM组)和41例无器质性心脏病患者(对照组)行心脏超声心动图和24h动态心电图检查,比较两组间AC值、DC值及心率变异性(HRV)指标的差别;DCM患者按DC值分为低、中、高危3组,比较3组间AC值、DC值、左房内径(LAd)、左室舒张末径(LVEDd)和左室射血分数(LVEF)的差别,并分析上述指标间的相关性。结果:与对照组相比,DCM组患者AC值增加[(-8.30±1.88)ms︰(-5.10±2.47)ms,P<0.01]、DC值降低[(7.90±1.94)ms︰(4.00±2.00)ms,P<0.01],HRV指标SDNN、LF和vLF均降低(均P<0.05)。与低危组相比,DCM中危组AC值增加[(-6.80±1.81)ms︰(-3.90±0.90)ms,P<0.01]、DC值降低[(6.40±1.56)ms︰(3.70±0.50)ms,P<0.01),但高危组AC值[(-5.80±4.32)ms]和DC值[(1.30±0.96)ms]较中危组均降低(P<0.01);DCM低、中、高危3组间LAd差别有统计学意义[(45.30±7.42)mm、(51.90±6.95)mm、(54.90±11.14)mm,P<0.01]。DCM患者AC值与LAd(r=0.473,P<0.01)、LVEDd(r=0.441,P<0.01)呈正相关,与LVEF呈负相关(r=-0.569,P<0.01);DC值与LAd(r=-0.505,P<0.01)、LVEDd(r=-0.421,P<0.01)呈负相关,与LVEF呈正相关(r=0.632,P<0.01)。结论:AC和DC评价自主神经功能优于HRV指标;DCM患者自主神经功能受损,与心脏本身病变进展相关。 Objective: To investigate the clinical significance of changes of heart rate acceleration (AC) and deceleration (DC) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Methods: Forty-three patients with DCM (DCM group) and 41 patients without organic heart disease (control group) underwent echocardiography and 24h electrocardiogram. The AC value, DC value and heart rate variability HRV). DCM patients were divided into low, medium and high risk groups according to the DC value. The AC value, DC value, LAd, LVEDd and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) differences, and analyze the correlation between the above indicators. Results: Compared with the control group, ACD in DCM patients increased (-8.30 ± 1.88) ms: (-5.10 ± 2.47) ms, P <0.01] 2.00) ms, P <0.01]. The HRV indexes SDNN, LF and vLF decreased (all P <0.05). Compared with the low-risk group, the AC value in DCM group increased [(-6.80 ± 1.81) ms: (-3.90 ± 0.90) ms, P <0.01] 0.50) ms, P <0.01). However, the AC value [(-5.80 ± 4.32) ms] and DC (1.30 ± 0.96 ms) in high risk group were lower than those in moderate risk group (45.3 ± 6.92) mm, (51.90 ± 6.95) mm, (54.90 ± 11.14) mm, respectively, P <0.01]. The AC in DCM patients was positively correlated with LAd (r = 0.473, P <0.01), LVEDd (r = 0.441, P <0.01) and negatively correlated with LVEF There was a negative correlation between LVEDd (r = -0.421, P <0.01) and LVEF (r = -0.505, P <0.01). CONCLUSION: AC and DC are superior to HRV in evaluating autonomic function. Autonomic dysfunction in patients with DCM is associated with the progression of the heart itself.
其他文献
目的:分析先天性心脏病(CHD)介入治疗未成功的原因及防治措施.方法:对1077例CHD患者进行介入治疗,回顾性分析介入治疗一次未成功的25例患者的临床资料.结果:1077例CHD患者中,
肺栓塞是临床中较常见的危重症,然而由于其临床表现不典型,存在误诊率、漏诊率与病死率高等特点。肺栓塞的常见心电图表现有心动过速、右束支传导阻滞、胸前导联T波倒置、SⅠ
射血分数降低的心力衰竭(心衰)具有很高的致死率与致残率,其治疗目前仍然是一大挑战。交感-迷走神经的失衡在射血分数降低的心衰发展过程中起到重要作用,压力反射激活疗法可
目的:观察红景天甙对间歇性低压低氧诱导的载脂蛋白E基因敲除(ApoE-/-)小鼠动脉粥样硬化斑块稳定性的影响。方法:30只8周龄健康雄性ApoE-/-小鼠随机分为常压常氧组(对照组)、
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
目的:研究膜突蛋白(Moesin)抗体在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)中的表达情况,并对患者进行全球急性冠状动脉综合征注册(GRACE)评分,探讨Moesin抗体、GRACE评分与ACS之间的相关性.
目的:探讨冠心病患者体内血浆脂蛋白a[LP(a)]水平与纤溶系统及冠状动脉(冠脉)血管病变程度的关系.方法:入选行冠脉造影确诊的冠心病住院患者128例(冠心病组),非冠心病57例(对
目的:探讨CH ADS2评分对心房颤动(房颤)导管消融并发症的预测价值.方法:回顾性分析非瓣膜病房颤初次导管消融的患者共251例,计算入院时的CHADS2评分:心力衰竭(1分)、高血压(1
目的:应用蛋白质组学双向荧光差异凝胶电泳和质谱技术筛选肺癌骨转移血清标志。方法:收集肺癌伴骨转移、无骨转移各24例血清样本。同组血清等量混合,用除白蛋白试剂盒除去血