情谊行为还是法律行为——德国联邦最高法院“女方停服避孕药”案评析

来源 :安徽大学法律评论 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:peiyhpyh
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
一、引言1900年施行的《德国民法典》,历经第一次世界大战、魏玛共和国、30年代世界经济大萧条、纳粹法西斯统治、东西德分裂、两德重新统一、欧洲共同体一体化,一直适用到今天。在这一百多年的发展过程中,德国的政治、经济、文化等领域的社会关系发生了巨大的变化,但是民法典在总体上却基本上保持了其制定之初的原貌。这一方面要归功于德国的立法机关,特别是第二次世界大战以后,德国立法机关在不断修订民法典有关章节、条款的同时,制定了大量的民事单行法,以调整新出现的社会经济关系。另一方面,德国各级司法机关,特别是第二次世界大战后设立的德国联邦最高法院(Bundes gerichts hof,简称BGH),通过其不断的司法审判活动,对民法及民法理论的发展也做出了重要的贡献。 I. INTRODUCTION The German Civil Code, implemented in 1900, has been used extensively since the First World War, the Weimar Republic, the Great Depression in the 1930s, the Nazi fascist rule, the East-West division, the reunification of the two Germanizations and the European Community. Apply to today. During this one hundred years of development, the social relations in Germany's political, economic and cultural fields have undergone tremendous changes. However, the civil code generally has basically maintained the original appearance of its formulation. This is due in part to the German legislature. Especially after the Second World War, the German legislature, while constantly revising the relevant sections and provisions of the Civil Code, has formulated a large number of civil solvency laws to adjust the emerging social economy relationship. On the other hand, the judiciary at all levels in Germany, especially the Bundesgerichts Hof (BGH) established after the Second World War, has also done a lot to promote the development of civil law and civil law theories through its continuous judicial activities Out of an important contribution.
其他文献
在比较法上,对法律行为理论及其制度的价值存在争议。本文从法学方法的角度,讨论何以在当时的德国会出现法律行为这一概念。文章认为,法律行为的概念与浪漫主义和精神科学对
英国高等法院王座庭商事法院于1999年5月18日就原告Manatee Towing Co.及Coastal Tug & Barge Inc.诉被告OceanbulkMaritime S.A.及Laura Maritime Inc.一案作出关于船舶买卖