论文部分内容阅读
故意伤害和寻衅滋事案件在司法实践中属多发性案件。但鉴于两罪在客观方面的行为、主观方面的目的、客体以及犯罪对象上都有着交叉重叠,导致司法实践中对两罪进行明确辨析存在一定难度,从而直接影响了案件的定罪量刑。文章不仅阐述了司法实践中故意伤害罪与寻衅滋事罪中随意殴打他人行为进行界定,尤其突出了故意伤害致人轻伤与随意殴打他人致人轻伤的界定。
Intentional injury and provocation of trouble cases in judicial practice are multiple cases. However, given the objective behavior of both crimes, the subjective goals, objects and objects of crime have overlapping, which makes it difficult to make a clear distinction between the two crimes in judicial practice, which directly affects the conviction and sentencing of the case. The article defines not only the random assault of others in the crime of intentional assault and the crime of provocation in judicial practice, but also highlights the definition of minor injuries caused by intentional injury and minor injuries caused by random assault.