论文部分内容阅读
现代主流经济学往往以效率原则来对制度安排进行评估,并把它视为一个客观的指标;但实际上,效率的界定首先以特定的目标设定为前提,而目的设定本身就暗含了价值判断。其实,总效率以社会财富最大化为意识形态,帕累托效率建立在原子个人主义的意识形态之上;两者都没有剖析成本—收益的具体分担,没有考察收益的分配比例。特别是,在基于力量博弈的均衡理论指导下,这些概念在实践应用中往往是体现了作为既得利益的强势者的利益要求。同时,尽管科斯中性定理强调,在交易成本为零的情况下产权界定与资源配置效率无关;但是,考虑到交易能力的差异,只有将产权界定为穷人所有,社会资源配置才会更有效率。
In modern mainstream economics, institutional arrangements are often evaluated on the principle of efficiency and regarded as an objective indicator. However, in fact, the definition of efficiency is premised on the setting of specific goals, and the setting of goals itself implies value judgement. In fact, the overall efficiency of social wealth to maximize ideology, Pareto efficiency based on atomic individualism ideology above; both did not analyze the specific cost-benefit sharing, did not examine the proportion of income distribution. In particular, under the guidance of the equilibrium theory based on the strength game, these concepts often reflect the interest demands of the powerful as vested interests in practice. At the same time, despite the Neutral theorem of Coase emphasizing that the definition of property rights has nothing to do with the efficiency of resource allocation when the transaction cost is zero, but considering the differences in transaction capabilities, the allocation of social resources will be more efficient only if property rights are defined as poor .