论文部分内容阅读
伴随社会改革的深入发展,对权利运用的边界性问题,普遍存在着“灰色地带”或相互越界的现象,个人权益得不到实现,相应的社会就无法维持衡平。权利的运用界限出现模糊性而不再泾渭分明时,我们该如何来解决权利边界模糊性问题的困扰。本文中通过对权利冲突产生的原因分析,相应的阐述了针对民法领域中的两种现象本质,即权利交集、交叉性和分离性。这种现象的产生可能是由于法律发展的不完善性,但是产生诸如此类的情形并不意味着阻碍了社会经济的发展模式,反而是促进法制的完备性。我们分别从公平限制原则、权利利益衡量和法官的自由心证制度三个方面来缓解权利冲突的紧迫性。
With the deepening development of social reform, there is a widespread “gray zone” or cross-border phenomenon with regard to the boundary issue of the application of rights. Individual rights and interests can not be realized and the corresponding society can not maintain its balance. How to solve the ambiguity of the right boundary when the boundary of the right to use is ambiguous and not clear. Through the analysis of the reasons for the conflicts of rights, this article elaborates the two phenomenon essences in the field of civil law, that is, the intersection of right, the intersection and the separation. This kind of phenomenon may be caused by the imperfection of legal development. However, the occurrence of such cases does not mean that it hinders the development mode of social economy, but rather promotes the completeness of the legal system. We ease the urgency of the conflict of rights from three aspects: the principle of fair restriction, the measurement of rights and interests, and the system of free assessment of judges.