T细胞免疫检测和蛋白芯片技术用于HIV感染人群中结核潜伏感染筛查的比较

来源 :中国卫生检验杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:bazzi89
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨结核感染T细胞免疫检测和蛋白芯片技术,在HIV感染合并结核潜伏感染者中的应用。方法用结核感染T细胞免疫检测(IGRA)和蛋白芯片试剂盒对116例明确诊断HIV感染者,进行γ-干扰素释放含量和IGg抗体检测。结果在HIV感染者中结核感染T细胞免疫检测法(IGRA)检出阳性率为21.6%,蛋白芯片技术检测阳性率为7.8%,且2种方法差异具有统计学意义(χ2=8.6,P<0.01)。按照CD4细胞计数≥200个/μl和CD4细胞计数<200个/μl分组,2组IGRA检出阳性率均高于蛋白芯片法的检出阳性率。IGRA在2组中的检出阳性率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 IGRA较适用于HIV/AIDS患者合并结核潜伏感染的筛查。蛋白芯片法不适用于HIV/AIDS患者合并结核潜伏感染的筛查。 Objective To explore the application of T cell immune detection and protein chip technology in tuberculosis infection in HIV infection complicated with tuberculosis latent infection. Methods Totally 116 cases of HIV-positive patients were diagnosed by IGT and protein chip kit, and the content of interferon-γ released and IGg antibody were detected. Results The positive rate of T cell immunoassay (IGRA) was 21.6% among TB patients with HIV infection and 7.8% by protein chip technology (χ2 = 8.6, P < 0.01). According to the CD4 cell count≥200 cells / μl and the CD4 cell count <200 cells / μl, the positive rates of IGRA in both groups were higher than those detected by the protein chip method. There was no significant difference in the positive rate of IGRA between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion IGRA is more suitable for HIV / AIDS patients with latent tuberculosis infection screening. Protein chip method is not suitable for HIV / AIDS patients with tuberculosis latent infection screening.
其他文献
本文对深圳某建筑企业人力资源现状进行了较为详细地描述,并针对其人力资源管理中的问题提出改革建议。 This paper gives a detailed description of the present situatio