论文部分内容阅读
司马迁的《史记》、班固的《汉书》在民族史的撰述上有杰出的成就。《史记》在体例上有开创 性贡献 ,为我们研究这些民族的史事留下了最早最有权威性的历史资料 ;《史记》反映了司马迁进步的民族 史观。《汉书》继承《史记》对民族史的重视 ,也为各民族立传。班固在史观、史识方面比不上《史记》 ,但仍 取得了很多成就 ,在整齐体例、扩充材料等方面 ,大大丰富了民族史传的内容。
Sima Qian’s “Historical Records”, Bangu’s “Han Dynasty” in the history of the nation’s writings have outstanding achievements. The Records of the Historian has made pioneering contributions to the system and left the earliest and most authoritative historical materials for the study of the historical events of these peoples. The Records of the Historian reflects Sima Qian’s progressive concept of national history. “Han” inherited “Historical Records” emphasis on the history of the nation, but also for all ethnic groups. Bancigur did not compare with “Historical Records” in terms of historical conception and historical knowledge, but many achievements were still made. In terms of neatness and material expansion, Bancun enriched the content of ethnic history.