论文部分内容阅读
一直以来,党和政府高度重视国家机关工作人员的清正廉洁问题并且通过立法的形式,加大了对贪污腐败犯罪的打击力度。近年来,随着社会经济的发展,人们的意识形态发生了新的变化,从社会利益转向满足个人利益的利己主义思想,出现了“公权力私有化”的现象,严重影响了国家机关工作人员的清正廉洁和国家、社会、人民的切身利益。为了打击此类犯罪行为,2009年10月16日,我国刑法修正案【七】中明确规定了“利用影响力受贿罪”。这一举措的出台,不仅在理论上对传统受贿罪的一次补充,而更为重要的是填补了目前我国反腐败制度和法律体系存在的空缺。从我国最高人民法院、检察院公布关于执行《中华人民共和国刑法》确定罪名补充规定【四】的通知,到时至今日,在全国范围内还没有一个判列。可见,利用影响力受贿犯罪的认定在司法实践中仍然是一个棘手的难题。因此,本文将以利用影响力受贿罪的认定为重点,分别对“与其他受贿赂犯罪”的区别以及存在的现实问题进行讨论。
All along, the party and government attach great importance to the integrity and integrity of the staff of state organs and, through the form of legislation, have stepped up the crackdown on corruption and corruption crimes. In recent years, with the development of society and economy, people’s ideology has undergone a new change. From social interests to the egoistic idea of satisfying individual interests, there has been a phenomenon of “privatization of public power.” This has seriously affected the state organs The integrity and integrity of staff and the vital interests of the country, society and people. In order to combat such criminal acts, on October 16, 2009, China’s Criminal Law Amendment [7] clearly stipulates that “the use of influence bribery”. The introduction of this measure is not only a theoretical supplement to the traditional crime of accepting bribes, but more importantly, it fills in the existing vacancies in the anti-corruption system and legal system in our country. From the Supreme People’s Court and the Procuratorate of our country, the circular on the supplementary provisions on the execution of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China [4] has been announced. Up to now, there has not been a nationwide list. Can be seen that the use of the influence of the crime of accepting bribes in the judicial practice is still a difficult problem. Therefore, this article will focus on the use of the influence of the crime of accepting bribes, and discuss the differences between “crimes against other bribery” and the existing practical problems.