论文部分内容阅读
埃利希的法社会学理论提出了经典的民间法概念模型,这一模型认为民间法具有道德的自持性,在应然和实然上都是排斥国家干预的。通过分析美国高校关于师生关系的自治法案例,可以看出,对社会权利进行再分配的要求,使得国家干预成为必要,这一干预动因区别于传统的法制统一理论证成途径。民间法面对这种国家干预可能给出正反馈,并采取修辞论证方式,重新论证干预结果的道德正当性,以将干预结果内化为新的民间法。
Ehrlich’s law and sociology theory proposed the classic conceptual model of folk law. This model holds that the folk law has the moral self-sustaining and should, of course, exclude state intervention. By analyzing the cases of the autonomy law of American universities on the relationship between teachers and students, it can be seen that the requirement of redistribution of social rights makes the state intervention necessary. The motivation of this intervention is different from that of the traditional theory of the unity of legal system. The civil law may give positive feedback to such state interference and take the rhetorical argumentation way to re-demonstrate the moral justification of the intervention result so as to internalize the intervention result into a new civil law.