作者通过对“知识”、“财富”和“所有”的解释学意义上的分析,以及对“生产资料系统所有制关系”的历史学和经济学视域的考察,指出,“知识所有权关系取代生产资料所有权关系、对知识的占有决定对社会财富的占有”的公式在逻辑上和事实上都说不通。从以实物性生产资料所有制关系为主体的生产资料所有制关系到以实物性生产资料所有制关系为基础、以知识性生产资料所有制关系为主导的生产资料系统所有制关系的变化,不会也不可能导致所谓的“劳动雇佣资本”的所有制关系状态的出现。作者认为,不搞清这方面的问题,就必然会曲解现代科学技术革命和知识经济发展给生产关系带来的变化。这样,在当代对马克思生产关系理论的丰富和发展就无从谈起。 Through the analysis of hermeneutics of “knowledge”, “wealth” and “all”, as well as the historical and economic perspectives of the “ownership of the means of production system”, the author points out that “the relationship of ownership of knowledge to replace the production The relationship between the ownership of data and the possession of knowledge determines the possession of social wealth ”can not be logically or factually connected. From the ownership of the means of production, which is mainly composed of the means of production of physical means, to the changes of the ownership of the means of production, which is dominated by the ownership of the means of production of the means, based on the ownership of the means of production of the material goods, does not and can not result The so-called “employment of labor capital,” the appearance of ownership relations. The author believes that without a clear understanding of these issues, it is bound to misinterpret the changes brought about by the development of modern science and technology and the development of knowledge economy. In this way, we can not talk about the enrichment and development of Marx’s theory of production relations in contemporary times.