论文部分内容阅读
司法机关以占有对抗主义为要旨对“买卖不破租赁”规则的法律续造并不能有效弥补合同法第229条的漏洞,而纯粹的登记对抗主义则可能导致“买卖不破租赁”滑向“买卖破除租赁”。未来《民法典·合同编》的制定当以租赁期限区分长期与短期租赁确立以占有对抗主义与附条件的登记对抗主义相结合的规则完善路径。
Judicial authorities to seize the confrontation of the main purpose of the “sale does not break the lease,” the law of the continuation of the law does not effectively make up for the loopholes in Article 229 of the contract, and pure registration antagonism may result in To “buy and sell to break the lease ”. The future development of “Civil Code and Contract Code” should be based on the lease term to distinguish between long-term and short-term leases to establish the path of perfection in the rules of combining antagonism with conditional registration rivalries.