民事诉讼法中是否应当规定当事人真实陈述义务,各国学者们的争论由来已久。当事人真实陈述义务作为一项法律义务的正当性依据问题应当是争论的关键,本文结合一个案例试就当事人真实陈述义务的正当性依据进行论证。 Whether the civil procedural law should stipulate the parties’ true statements and obligations, the debates of scholars in various countries have been going on for a long time. The issue of the party’s true presentation of obligations as a legitimate basis for legal obligations should be the key issue in the debate. This article attempts to demonstrate the justification of the parties’ true presentation of obligations by combining a case.