我们根据对于中西哲学各自的特质是否有清楚的认识和对于中国哲学之适应现代生活是否有自信心而将中西哲学的对话划分为四种范式 :无清楚认识而自信、无清楚认识而不自信、有清楚认识而自信和有清楚认识而不自信。在中西哲学的对话历史上 ,第二种对话范式曾长期居于支配地位 ,而近年来第三种范式的兴起则有着特别重要的意义 ,它使得中国传统哲学有可能以某种方式获得重建 ,并与第四种对话范式构成有利于真正形成一种适应于现代社会生活的现代中国哲学的张力关系。而这两种具有张力的对话范式之间的互动关系 ,将会长期存在下去 According to whether there is a clear understanding of the respective traits of Chinese and Western philosophy and whether there is self-confidence in adapting Chinese philosophy to modern life, we divide the dialogue between Chinese and Western philosophies into four paradigms: no clear understanding and self-confidence, no clear understanding and no self-confidence, Have a clear understanding of self-confidence and a clear understanding of not confident. In the history of dialogues between Chinese and Western philosophy, the second paradigm of dialogue has long dominated. The rise of the third paradigm in recent years is of particular importance. It has made it possible for traditional Chinese philosophy to be rebuilt somehow And the fourth paradigm of dialogue constitute a tension relationship that is conducive to the real formation of a modern Chinese philosophy that is adapted to the modern social life. The interactive relationship between these two tense dialogue paradigms will exist for a long time to come