近日通读今年第2期《军事历史》,总的感觉是杂志越办越好,受到广大读者的欢迎。从本期的栏目设置和内容上看,突出的特点,一是针对性强。如《苏联30年代军事改革的曲折及其教训》、《漫议我国历史上军队的生产经营》等文章很有借鉴意义。二是信息量比较大。从《太平洋彼岸看中国的淮海战役》、《中国古代突破长江天堑的成功作战》,到中国收复南沙群岛实录等文章都能给人以启迪,使人读后有新鲜感。为使《军事历史》办得更好,建议:(1)重点再突出一些。每期相对地突出一个中心,回答一两个突出问题,有几篇“拳头产品”,象去年第5、6期纪念三大战役40周年那样,就比较受欢迎。(2)加强 Read the recent No. 2 “military history” this year, the general feeling is that the magazine is getting better and better, welcomed by the majority of readers. From the current section of the column settings and content point of view, outstanding features, first, targeted. Such as “the Soviet Union in the twists and turns of the military reforms in the 1930s and its lessons,” “long on the history of our army production and management” and other articles is of great significance. Second, the amount of information is relatively large. From “The Huaihai Campaign on the Other Side of the Pacific”, “The Successful Operation of Breakthrough the Natural Precipitation in the Yangtze River in Ancient China” to the Recovering Record of the Nansha Islands by China can give enlightenment and make people feel fresh after reading. In order to make “military history” better, it is advisable to: (1) focus more on it. Each issue relatively stands out as a center, answering one or two salient questions, and several “fist products,” like the 40th anniversary of the three major campaigns of the 5th and 6th last year, are more popular. (2) to strengthen