长期以来,学术界许多人持有这样的观点,即认为和平过渡仅仅是指“无产阶级通过资产阶级议会的稳定多数,取得国家政权的议会道路”。甚至有些人认为,“革命导师从未有过无产阶级政党在议会民主制度和传统下通过议会多数就可以取得政权,从而过渡到社会主义的提法和思想。”还有人认为,“以暴力为后盾的革命和平转变,应属于暴力革命的范畴。”纵观马克思、恩格斯、列宁、斯大林对革命道路的论述及其展现的思想,所谓“和平过渡”,应当是指无产阶级在实现社会主义革命的过程中,采取了非暴力的、和平的、民主的革命方式。他们既没有否 For many years now, many in the academic community have held the view that the peaceful transition only refers to “the parliamentary path for the proletariat to gain state power through the stable majority of the bourgeois parliament.” Some even think that “the revolutionary mentor has never had any chances of a political proletarian party gaining power through the parliamentary majority under the parliamentary democracy and tradition, thereby transitioning to socialist formulation and thinking.” Others argue that “violence The revolutionary and peaceful transformation of the backing should belong to the category of violent revolution. ”Looking at Marx’s, Engels, Lenin and Stalin’s discourse on the revolutionary road and the ideas they represent, the so-called“ peaceful transition ”should mean that the proletariat is carrying out the socialist revolution In the process, a non-violent, peaceful and democratic revolutionary approach has taken place. Neither are they