韩愈与刘、柳对永贞革新认识的异同比较略论

来源 :周口师专学报 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wahahabookbb
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
韩愈与刘禹锡、柳宗元等对永贞革新认识的异同实与中唐社会思潮、文学思潮和政治背景密切相关。他们都有儒家的积极用世之心,对现实政治问题的许多见解并没有多大不同。但在实现政治理想的过程、在实现政治理想方式上,却表现出很大的区别。首先,对“道”的内容有着不同的解释:韩愈所谓“道”专指儒家仁义之道,而刘柳的“道”亦兼括佛道。其次,刘柳更相信“人为”的力量,认为人胜于天;韩愈则认为人类乃残害天地万物之祸首,认为天胜于人。韩愈重视儒家政治理想和儒家人格标准的完美结合,刘柳则重在“势”字,主张顺应时势,不惮改作。 The similarities and differences between Han Yu and Liu Yuxi and Liu Zongyuan in reformation of Yongzhen are closely related to the social thoughts, literary trends and political backgrounds in Middle Tang Dynasty. All of them have the active worldly view of Confucianism, and they do not differ much from many of the current political issues. However, the process of realizing political ideal has shown great differences in the way of realizing political ideal. First of all, there are different interpretations of the content of “Tao”: Han Yu’s so-called “Tao” refers specifically to the Confucian doctrine of benevolence, and Liu’s “Tao” also includes Buddhism and Taoism. Second, Liu Liu believes that “man-made” strength, that people are better than the sky; Han Yu believes that human beings ruin the culprit in all things, that heaven is better than people. Han Yu attaches great importance to the perfect combination of Confucian political ideals and Confucian standards of personality, while Liu Liu focuses on the word “potential” and advocates conforming to the current situation and daring to make changes.
其他文献
新课程标准对小学语文教材内容、课堂教学等都作了较为具体的阐释与研究,然而却没提及作业活动,传统的语文作业显然不适应新课程标准要求。小学语文开放性作业设计,体现了形式多样、内容综合、完成自主的原则,要通过包装法、设疑法、深化法、实验法来实现,提高了学生学习兴趣和语文素养,拓展了语文学习空间和学生知识面,促进学生个性和谐发展。  作业要适应课改变化  作业是课堂教学的延续,是课内知识的外向扩展。作业既