论文部分内容阅读
學術研究中,新材料往往能形成新學問,故極受學者青睞。但真理與謬誤,往往就在一線之間。一則新材料,可能産生新觀點,也可能因爲失却冷静客觀的思辨,陷入炫奇争新,先入爲主的泥淖,以致不顧年代之邈遠隔絶,版本之差異優劣,史源之混淆不清,淡化、忽略甚至隱匿反證,從而做出有失常態的翻案或新論。今以筆者近年來所見據新材料而提出的“地方某里”新解、岳飛作《滿江紅》新證、唐永王璘謀逆案真相以及白居易生卒年等四種新説爲例,略作辨析,以期讀者在面對新材料的時候,能多一些年代意識、版本意識、史源意識和批判意識。
In academic research, new materials tend to form new learning, so very popular scholars. But truth and fallacy are often in the forefront. A new material may give rise to new ideas. It may also result in the absence of calm and objective speculation, falling into the trap of vying for new ideas and preconceived ideas, so that regardless of the long-term isolation and difference in versions, the confusion of historical sources, Dilute, ignore or even hide the anti-card, so as to make an unconventional reversal or new theory. This article takes the new material proposed by the author in recent years as the new solution of “somewhere in a place”, Yue Fei’s new evidence of “Jiang Jianghong”, the truth of the overture case of Tang Yongwang and the death and death of Bai Juyi as examples, Discrimination, in order to readers in the face of new materials, to some more awareness of the times, version of the sense of origin and critical consciousness.