欣克利如果没有一个有钱的老爸,他也会向总统里根开枪。但他恐怕无法逃脱牢狱之灾。但仅仅有个有钱的老爸是不够的。有权用枪来保护自己,这是美国人的观念,在这种观念下,律师可以理直气壮地为欣克利作无罪辩护。此案真正的意义不在于凶手是否有精神病,而在于:人人可以投一票与人人可以开一枪,是无法分开的。 Hinkley would also shoot President Reagan without a rich dad. But he probably can not escape prison. But having a wealthy father is not enough. The right to use guns to protect themselves is the American idea that lawyers can justifiably plead innocent Hinkley. The real significance of the case lies not in whether the murderer has mental illness, but in that it is inseparable from the fact that everyone can cast a vote and everyone can shoot a shot.