论文部分内容阅读
本文既是对方绍伟先生《什么转型?为何危机?》一文的回应,也借此更加深入地讨论政治学研究方法。本文认为,我们对社会转型的研究首先要实现对所研究的问题的转换,即把社会转型问题具体化,把社会转型问题转变为政治社会结构变迁问题,通过对政治社会结构的基本要素的研究发现要素的特质以及彼此的边界。通过对钻石型社会与石墨型社会的比较,我们发现了现代文明存在的密码是资本结构的生命力,无论是经济资本还是政治资本、社会资本抑或其他资本,其结构的解体将会导致资本的流失。所以,我们必须促进政治社会结构密度的增加来促使资本的增殖,这个密码破译了当前全球经济危机的本质。方先生固有的思维惯性和局限性使得其以一种看似新颖的概念浅显地诠释了这个世界,所以其开出的药方千篇一律,更与自己强调的世界多样性自掐。但是方先生所质疑的问题也是笔者拙著《现代文明的密码》以及此前文章所批判的对象,所以方先生的质疑恰恰证明了笔者观点的合理性。
This article is not only a response from Mr. Fang Shaowei, “What is the transition? Why?”, But also take this way to discuss political science research methods in more depth. This paper argues that our research on social transformation must first realize the transformation of the problems studied, that is, to concreteize the social transformation and transform the social transformation into the issue of political and social structural changes. By studying the basic elements of the political and social structure, Discover the characteristics of features and their boundaries. By comparing the diamond-based society with the graphite-based society, we find that the code of the existence of modern civilization is the vitality of capital structure. The disintegration of its structure will lead to the loss of capital, whether economic capital, political capital, social capital or other capital . Therefore, we must promote the proliferation of capital by promoting the increase in the density of political and social structures, a code that deciphers the essence of the current global economic crisis. Mr. Fang’s inherent inertia and limitations of thinking make it plainly interpret the world in a seemingly novel concept, so his prescriptions are monotonous and even more pinpointed by the diversity of the world he emphasizes. However, Mr. Fang questioned the author is my clumsy “password of modern civilization” and the articles criticized by the previous object, so Mr. Fang’s question just proved the author’s point of view is reasonable.