论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析超声弹性成像与超声造影对肝肿瘤的诊断效果。方法:收集我院2015年3月至2016年3月收治的肝肿瘤患者76例,术前均行超声弹性成像和超声造影检查,比较超声弹性成像和超声造影与病理诊断(黄金标准)的结果。结果:超声弹性成像与病理检查结果比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);超声造影与病理检查结果无统计学差异(P>0.05);超声弹性成像和超声造影的敏感性、特异性、准确性无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:超声弹性成像、超声造影对肝肿瘤诊断中均有重要价值,建议二者联合检测,提高肝肿瘤检出准确率。
Objective: To analyze the diagnostic value of ultrasound elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in liver tumors. Methods: Totally 76 patients with liver cancer who were admitted to our hospital from March 2015 to March 2016 were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent ultrasound elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound before operation. The results of ultrasound elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and pathological diagnosis (gold standard) were compared . Results: There was no significant difference between ultrasound elastography and pathological examination (P> 0.05). There was no significant difference between CEUS and pathology (P> 0.05). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of EUS and CEUS No statistical difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound are both valuable in the diagnosis of hepatic tumors. It is suggested that the two methods should be combined to improve the detection accuracy of hepatic tumors.