论文部分内容阅读
考夫曼在《存在主义》中指出陀思妥耶夫斯基开启存在主义的序曲,而将加缪作为结尾。虽立足于不同民族,但都发出诅咒。在现代性认识、存在困境上,二者都展现张力,却是不同方向的撕扯。现代性,施特劳斯认为至少起源于马基雅维里,又经笛卡尔、康德一路演绎,二十世纪到顶峰。最宽泛的信念:相信历史,遵从进步,要求摆脱对自然正义的诉求,走向科学理性。而舍斯托夫对陀氏极为推崇,认为其表现了悲剧哲学意蕴:要抛弃过去相信和热爱的,把过去奉为理想的东西视为虚假和反常。本文从《一个荒唐人的梦》与《局外人》出发,借助舍斯托夫“悲剧哲学”理论,从三个方面对现代性困境做一番浅探。
In his existentialism, Kaufman points out Dostoyevsky’s prelude to existentialism and ends Camus. Although based on different ethnic groups, but issued a curse. In the understanding of modernity and the existence of predicaments, both show tension, but they tear in different directions. Modernity, Strauss at least originated in Machiavelli, but also by Descartes, Kant all the way to the twentieth century to the peak. The most general belief: to believe in history and to comply with progress requires that we should get rid of the appeal for natural justice and move towards scientific rationality. Shestoff, on the other hand, was very much in favor of the Dusanz, thinking that it represented the philosophical tragedy of the tragedy: to abandon what it believed and loved in the past, and to regard the past as an ideal as illusions and anomalies. Starting from “a ridiculous human dream” and “outsider”, this article makes a brief exploration of the predicament of modernity from three aspects with the help of the theory of tragedy philosophy.