法律适用中的概念使用与法律论证——以泸州遗赠案为分析对象

来源 :法哲学与法社会学论丛 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:liongliong583
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
我可以不韪地说,我们现阶段的执法者,不论其为司法官或行政官,不患其不能自由,唯恐其不知科学,不患其拘泥逻辑,唯恐其没有概念。~(〔1〕)——王伯琦一、引言发生在四川省泸州市的“张学英诉蒋伦芳遗赠纠纷案”(以下简称“泸州遗赠案”)一度引起广泛关注而成为公共事件,如今,有关该案的讨论已渐趋平息。重拾旧话,不是为了再次强调遗嘱自由或公序良俗的重大意义,或者继续试图 I can not presume to say that at this stage, law enforcement officials, whether they are magistrates or administrators, are not free from their own freedom and are afraid that they will not know science and will not be subject to their rigid logic for fear that they have no concept. (1) - Wang Boqi I. INTRODUCTION “Zhang Xueying v. Jiang Lunfang Bequest Dispute Case” (hereinafter referred to as “Luzhou Legacy Case”) occurred in Luzhou City, Sichuan Province for a time and attracted widespread attention and became a public event. Today, The discussion on the case has gradually subsided. To regain the old saying is not to once again emphasize the great significance of the freedom of testament or public order and good habits, or to continue trying
其他文献