论文部分内容阅读
江西靖安磉都综合利用联合加工厂刘泽民来信说:我是《军事历史》杂志的忠实读者,从1987—1992年,年年订阅《军事历史》,现从我五年来所读《军事历史》文章的整体上,谈几点粗浅看法。一、我认为贵刊对古近代史的研究一直是个薄弱环节,特别是对古代军事战略方面的研究文章尤其少见。我们的祖先在战略方面为后世留下了许多宝贵的东西,这些战略的奥妙应该得到阐述。有人说,历史是战略的学校,英国巴兹尔·亨利·利德尔——哈特的《战略论》,就是以战史为教材来讲解战略的。为此,建议贵刊将中国战争史上有价值的战略内容,纳入选题计划,坚持下去,经过一段时间的积累,可将这方面的内容汇编起来,我想绝不会比《战略论》逊色。我衷心希望贵刊能注意这方面的研究,并盼能因此成就一部有中国特色的《战略论》。
From the 1987-1992 edition, I subscribe to “military history” every year, and from the “military history” that I have read in the past five years, I am a faithful reader of Military History magazine. Overall article, talk a few superficial views. First, I think your study on ancient and modern history has always been a weak link, especially the research articles on ancient military strategies are especially rare. Our ancestors have left many valuable things strategically for generations to come and the secrets of these strategies deserve to be expounded. Some people say that history is a strategic school. The strategy of Basle Henry Liddell-Hart in Britain is based on the history of war as a teaching material to explain the strategy. Therefore, it is suggested that your magazine should incorporate valuable strategic elements in the history of the Chinese war into the topic selection plan and stick to it. After a period of accumulation, this content can be compiled and I would in no way be inferior to Strategy . I sincerely hope that your magazine will pay attention to the research in this field and hope that it will accomplish the “strategic theory” with Chinese characteristics.