网络服务提供者作为看门人角色应该对其网络用户所发布的信息尽到善良管理人的合理注意义务:如果网络用户发布的信息侵犯第三人的权利并且网络服务提供者没有尽到合理注意义务,则应与该网络用户承担共同侵权责任;不同的网络服务提供者以及不同的服务类型使得合理注意义务的标准都不尽相同,合理注意义务的标准应该从司法实践中加以总结和确认,并且与网络自治和道德规范形成有机的结合,从而实现法律与道德规范建设的良性互动;《侵权责任法》中对于网络服务提供者的侵权责任采纳通知—删除责任模式是不合适的,因为这样的规定与一般侵权法中的合理注意义务侵权模式不符合,并且也误解了版权法中的通知—删除责任模式。 The network service provider, as a gatekeeper, should give due care to the good manager of the information posted by his network users: if the information posted by the network users infringes on the rights of third parties and the network service provider fails to exercise due care , Then the network users should bear joint tort liability; Different network service providers and different service types make the standards of reasonable attention duty vary, and the standards of reasonable care duty should be summarized and confirmed from the judicial practice, and And the network autonomy and ethics form an organic combination in order to achieve the legal and ethical construction of the benign interaction; tort liability law for network service providers to take notice of tort liability - delete liability model is inappropriate, because such The provisions do not conform to the pattern of reasonable duty of care in the general tort law and also misunderstood the notice in the copyright law - the pattern of deletion of liability.