论文部分内容阅读
法律解释与法律推理作为两种相对独立的法律方法,存在不可分割的交融关系,它们对法治建设有着不同的意义。法律解释的功能是要充分展示法律文本的各种可能意义,而法律推理则强调结论的必然得出。由于二者都强调根据法律进行解释或推理,因而拥有大体相似的思维走向。但作为法律方法论体系的不同组成,二者在地位、作用、关联等方面都存在许多细微的差别,必须加以区分。
As two relatively independent legal methods, legal interpretation and legal reasoning exist inseparable blending relations, which have different meanings to the construction of rule of law. The function of legal interpretation is to fully display the various possible meanings of legal texts, while legal reasoning emphasizes the inevitable conclusion of the conclusion. Since both emphasize interpretation or reasoning according to law, they have a generally similar line of thinking. However, as different components of the legal methodology, there are many subtle differences in their status, role and relevance, which must be distinguished from each other.