当前在取保候审的执行中存在着以下问题: 1.取保候审的决定与执行衔接渠道不畅表现之一,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人被取保候审后,决定机关不通知执行机关,直接与被取保候审人、保证人联系。犯罪嫌疑人、被告人居住地派出所不掌握其被取保候审的情况,无法对其执行监督、考察,形成决定机关与执行机关都不管的局面,致使被取保候审人完全处于失控状态。这种现象在公、检、法三机关决定的取保候审中皆有存在。有的犯罪嫌疑人在甲地犯罪被取保候审后,又到乙地重新犯罪,再次被取保候审,而犯罪嫌疑人居住地派出所对此却一无所知;有的犯罪嫌疑人被取保候审后便杳无踪迹,音信全无。表现之二,决定机关虽然通知了执行机关,但法律手续不完备。如采用电话、写信或传真等方式通知 Currently, there are the following problems in the implementation of the bail pending trial: 1. As one of the performance awaiting release of awaiting trial and the channel of poor performance in execution, the criminal suspects and the defendants are released on bail and the authorities decide not to notify the executive authorities directly and are bailed out When trial, guarantor contact. The suspect and the defendant’s police station where they live are not in control of the conditions under which they are released from bail and are unable to supervise and inspect them. This situation leaves the decision-making organs and the executive authorities totally unmanaged, leaving the bail to be released completely out of control. This phenomenon exists in the bail pending trial decided by the public authorities, prosecutors and courts. Some criminal suspects were released on bail pending trial on the crime of a crime and again went to Ground B for a new crime. They were once released on bail pending trial. The police station where the criminal suspect resided did not know anything about it. Some suspects were released on bail Without trace, no news. The second performance, although the decision-making body informed the executive, but the legal formalities are not complete. Such as the use of telephone, write letters or fax notification