论文部分内容阅读
警察权作为一种社会治理的有效工具反而常被人视为了一个治理对象,这主要是由于人们只看到了警察权与公民权对立冲突的一面。而他们要求对警察权的规制则又容易导致矫枉过正。孱弱的警察权无法有效的实现其社会职能。若是能全面的分析二者的关系便会发现警察权与公民权在一定意义上具有实质上的统一性和利益的一致性,警察权的有效行使能够有力的保护公民的权利。我们不能一味的去要求规制警察权,对于警察权的规制重点首先应在于寻求一个限制警察权大小的合适的度及限制警察职权滥用行为上。
As an effective tool of social governance, police power is often regarded as an object of governance. This is mainly because people only see the aspect of the confrontation between police power and citizenship. And they demand that the regulation of police power can easily lead to overcorrection. Weak police power can not effectively fulfill its social functions. If we can comprehensively analyze the relationship between the two, we will find that the police power and the citizenship right have the substantive unity and interest consistency in a certain sense. The effective exercise of the police power can effectively protect the rights of the citizens. We can not blindly ask for the regulation of police power. The regulation of police power should first and foremost focus on seeking a proper degree of restraint on the size of police power and restricting abuse of police power.