论文部分内容阅读
但凡介绍自己收藏书画的买家,不管是口头的还是书面的,几乎都要“讲述”一段既曲折又生动的故事,而故事的逻辑性也是非常清晰连贯的。仅故事情节而言,其合情合理性是不容置疑的。问题是,我们最终要面对的是藏品,考究的是藏品是不是某一个画家的真迹。要言之,故事的真实性和书画的真伪之间并不能直接划等号。某刊2012年第10期曾刊有《从我收藏的吴湖帆山水画说起》一文,作者讲述了他收藏吴湖帆一幅青绿山水画的故事,应该说,当事人故事的真实性我们没有理由给予怀疑,
However, buyers who introduce their own collection of paintings, both verbally and in writing, almost always “tell” a period of twists and turns while the logic of the story is also very clear and coherent. Just the story, the reasonableness of it is beyond doubt. The problem is that we ultimately have to face the collection, the elegant is the collection is not an authentic artist. In short, the authenticity of the story and the authenticity of calligraphy and painting can not be directly equated. An article published in 2012 No. 10 once published “from my collection of Wu Hufan landscape painting” one article, the author tells the story of his collection of Wu Hufan a green landscape, it should be said that the truth of the parties the story we have no reason to give any doubt,