论文部分内容阅读
通过将“赔命价”习惯法与血亲复仇进行对比研究,可看出“赔命价”制度具有明显的节约社会资源、降低社会成本的优势。“赔命价”制度变迁的实质是通过减少案件类型、缩小谈判区域值等措施,促使双方当事人更便利地就赔偿标准达成一致意见。这也说明制度运行成本在很大程度上引导着制度变迁的方向。要更好的促进国家法与民族习惯法之间的融合,经济理性这一角度是必须加以重视和考虑的。
By contrasting the customary law of “compensation for life” and the revenge of blood relatives, we can see that the system of “compensation for the price of life” has obvious advantages of saving social resources and reducing social costs. The essence of system change is to reduce the types of cases and narrow the negotiation area so as to make it more convenient for both parties to reach an agreement on compensation standards. This also shows that the operating costs of the system to a large extent guide the direction of institutional change. In order to better promote the integration between national law and national customary law, economic rationality must be given due consideration and consideration.