论文部分内容阅读
我国的犯罪论体系立足于社会危害性、违法性以及应收处罚性的主客观相统一的结构,犯罪客观方面在故意犯罪中是故意的认识内容。但在现行刑法分则如129条等之规定,危害结果在这些犯罪中不属于故意的认识内容。客观处罚条件的概念引入有助于分则条文的合理解释,但并不能直接使用此概念,而破坏我国传统犯罪构成的架构。在刑事法领域,必须结合刑事政策和犯罪的追诉程序,有效的解释此特殊现象与消解可能带来的矛盾。
The system of crime in our country is based on the unification of subjectivity and objectivity of social harmfulness, illegality and punishment of punishments. The objective aspect of crime is intentional knowledge in intentional crime. However, according to the provisions of the current Criminal Law, for example, Article 129, the result of the harm does not belong to the intentional knowledge in these crimes. The introduction of the concept of objective penalty conditions contributes to the reasonable interpretation of the sub-provisions, but it can not directly use this concept and undermine the framework of our traditional crime. In the field of criminal law, it is necessary to combine criminal prosecution procedures with criminal policies to effectively explain the contradictions this special phenomenon may bring with resolution.