论文部分内容阅读
20世纪20年代初,中国学人逐渐形成了努力发展现代文史研究以与西方汉学竞胜的学术共识。受此信念驱动,胡适、陈垣、陈寅恪等人,在批判继承乾嘉汉学遗产基础上,借鉴西方汉学将文史研究与现代考古学、语言学结合的治学路径,努力打破陈旧观念,发展出可与西方汉学界竞胜的现代文史研究形态——新汉学,并试图将北大国学门、清华国学院打造成新汉学的中心。虽然这一努力遭受挫折,但其理念及积淀的经验与学术人才,对此后中国现代文史研究的发展产生了重要影响。傅斯年领导的史语所正是承接了前一时期新汉学发展的经验与人才,并将与西方汉学竞胜以争取国家荣耀的理念意识形态化,才迅速蓬勃发展成为中国文史研究的领导机构,并最终完成了中国文史研究的现代转化。
In the early 1920s, Chinese scholars gradually formed their academic consensus on striving to develop modern studies of history and literature so as to compete with Western Sinology. Driven by this belief, Hu Shi, Chen Yuan and Chen Yin Ke, based on the critique of inheriting the legacy of Qianghu and Han dynasties, draw lessons from the western scholarship path of combining western and Chinese studies with modern archeology and linguistics and strive to break the old ideas and develop And the study of modern Chinese literature and history which is comparable to that of the Western Sinology. It tries to make the Peking University, Tsinghua University, the center of Neo-Sinology. Although this effort suffered setbacks, its philosophy and accumulated experience and academic talents have had a significant impact on the development of modern Chinese literature and history since then. The history of Fu Sinian led the rapid development of China’s history of literature and history as the leading institution for undertaking the experience and talents of the development of Neo-Sinology and for the ideological ideology of win-win with Western Sinology for national glory. And finally completed the modern transformation of the study of Chinese literature and history.