论文部分内容阅读
目的：对比分析预成纤维桩或可塑纤维桩在口腔修复中起到的临床效果。方法：基于诊所挂号单奇偶性将100例需要口腔修复患者划分为实验组和对照组，对照组采用金属桩；实验组则采用预成纤维桩或可塑纤维桩进行修复，对比分析两组临床效果。结果：修复完成后，实验组成功率和满意度高于对照组，且操作所需时间明显短于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论：相比于金属桩，预成纤维桩或可塑纤维桩对于口腔修复的效果更加明显，临床应用价值大。“,”Objective: A comparative analysis of clinical effect about prefabricated fiber post or plastic fiber post in prosthodontics. Method: Based on the clinic appointment number, 100 cases of dental patients were divided into experimental and control groups. The control group was treated with metal casting post and the study group was treated with prefabricated fiber post or plastic fiber post restoration, then comparative analysis of clinical effects was carried out. Results: After the restoration is complete, the success rate and satisfaction in the study group is higher than that in the control group and the time required is significantly shorter than the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Compared to metal posts, the clinical effect of prefabricated fiber post or plastic fiber post is more significant in prosthodontics. The clinical application value of prefabricated fiber post or plastic fiber post is larger.