论文部分内容阅读
本文旨在促进一种理论与实践相结合的、更加全面的乌托邦研究。文章首先分析了乌托邦的批判者与捍卫者的主要观点,指出前者主要反对乌托邦所具有的那种从既有现实中抽象出来的非历史及反政治特征,而后者提出的某些乌托邦概念中存在的问题在某种程度上为反乌托邦批判提供了支持。在此基础上,通过进一步追溯乌托邦与历史之间的关系,作者在超验的乌托邦与基于现实的乌托邦之间作出了理论区分,进而指出,对于在由市场驱动的资本主义全球化中寻求重新掌控自身生存条件的基层社会运动而言,基于现实的乌托邦具有更强的解释力,也与政治具有更紧密的关联性。
The purpose of this article is to promote a more comprehensive utopian study that combines theory with practice. The article first analyzes the main views of the utopian critics and defenders, pointing out that the former mainly opposes the non-historical and anti-political features that the utopian possesses from the existing realities, while the latter proposes some utopian concepts To some extent, the issue of dystopian criticism has been supported. On this basis, by further tracing the relationship between utopia and history, the author makes a theoretical distinction between transcendental utopia and reality-based utopia, and points out that for seeking renewal in market-driven capitalist globalization For the grassroots social movements that control their own living conditions, reality-based utopias have stronger explanatory power and are more closely linked with politics.