本文在澄清“矛盾”、“自涉”、“意义”、“禁止”诸概念基础上 ,评析了塔斯基的“说谎者”悖论 ,指出了皮亚斯观点的“灼见”与“不足” ;刻意分辨了“仅是矛盾”与“矛盾被证” ,指出“强化谎者”悖论之根源在于“复合命题”谬误 On the basis of clarifying the conceptions of “contradiction”, “self-reference”, “meaning” and “forbidding”, this article analyzes Tarski’s “liar” paradox and points out the “insight” and “inadequacy ”; Deliberately distinguish between“ only contradiction ”and“ contradictory evidence ”, pointing out that the“ Liar Emphasis ”paradox lies in the“ composite proposition ”fallacy