和谐司法理念的提出,回应的正是现实需求与司法发展规律的优先选择,体现了新时期人民司法工作的重要特征。在法院,尤其是基层法院审理的行政诉讼案件中,有相当部分案件当事人提起诉讼的缘由并非单纯对行政行为不服,而是对先前的民事纠纷或者民事诉讼中涉及行政行为确认的事实无法厘清。对于这部分的行政行为,案件当事人只能被迫先放下民事争端,转而启动行政诉讼,向“公家讨个公道”才能继续解决先前的民事纠纷,增加工作量和审理难度,造成司法资源的浪费。 The proposal of harmonious judicial concept, the response to which is the priority choice of the actual demand and the law of the development of the judiciary, embodies the important features of people’s judicial work in the new era. In the courts, especially the administrative litigation cases before the grassroots courts, a considerable number of the parties to the litigation do not simply refuse to accept the administrative act, but can not clarify the fact of the previous civil disputes or the civil actions involved in the administrative act. For this part of the administrative act, the parties to the case can only be compelled to put aside their civil disputes first, and instead start administrative proceedings and seek “justice from the public” to continue to settle the previous civil disputes, increase the workload and ease the trials, Waste of resources.