论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较头孢唑林钠与头孢替安对剖宫产围术期患者术后切口感染预防用药的价值及其用药费用。方法:选取2014年12月—2016年12月期间收治的行剖宫产产婴患者96例临床资料,按照其入院顺序号将其分为治疗组和对照组(每组48例);在剖宫产围手术期内对照组患者给予头孢替安预防术后切口感染,治疗组患者则给予头孢唑林钠预防术后切口感染,比较两组患者用药后各项指标(治疗时间、抗菌药物费用、体温复常时间、白细胞计数和中性粒细胞计数值的变化情况。结果:治疗组患者用药后各项指标(治疗时间、抗菌药物费用、体温复常时间、白细胞计数和中性粒细胞计数值均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:头孢唑林钠对剖宫产围术期产妇术后切口感染的预防作用和用药费用均优于头孢替安。
Objective: To compare the value of cefazolin sodium and cefotiam on prophylactic use of incision infection after cesarean section perioperative period and its cost of medication. Methods: A total of 96 cases of cesarean section infants who were admitted to our hospital from December 2014 to December 2016 were selected and divided into treatment group and control group (48 cases in each group) Patients in the control group were given cefotiam to prevent postoperative incision infection during the perioperative period in the uterus, and patients in the treatment group were given cefazolin sodium to prevent postoperative wound infection. Comparisons were made between the two groups after treatment (treatment time, cost of antimicrobial drugs , Body temperature of normal time, white blood cell count and neutrophil count changes.Results: The treatment group of patients after treatment of various indicators (treatment time, antimicrobial drug costs, body temperature, time, white blood cell count and neutrophil count (P <0.05) .Conclusion: Cefazolin sodium is superior to cefotiam in prophylaxis and cost of wound infection after cesarean delivery.