论文部分内容阅读
本文从约翰·福尔斯的小说与哲学互文性的角度归纳、厘清、剖析、点评其浓重而独特的存在之思:上帝隐退无为;此在卡在物理、情绪、精神、认知的种种误区和两难中;个体渺小虚无。于是,他的小说常常描述上帝缺场、智者出场、极端环境中的身心反应、命与仇谋、渺小情结等。个体应对存在压力的对策则是自我放逐、反叛、责任、仁爱。但是,当上述哲学观点转换为文学叙事时,却常常偏颇过度,欠缺圆融辩证,使人迷惑,引人诟病。
This article summarizes, clarifies, analyzes, and comments on its strong and unique existence from the perspective of John Fors’ s novels and philosophical intertextuality: God is retiring; this card is based on physical, emotional, spiritual, cognitive All kinds of errors and dilemmas; individual naught. Thus, his novels often describe the absence of God, the presence of wise men, physical and mental reactions in extreme circumstances, life and hatred, and so on. The response of individuals to stressors is self-exile, rebellion, responsibility and love. However, when the above philosophical views are transformed into literary narratives, they are often over-biased, lack of a round-robin dialectic, confusing and provoking criticism.