论文部分内容阅读
随机抽取我省20家木质家具制造企业,按照职工人数分为大型(300人以上)和小型(300人以下)两种类型,采用统一调查表问卷调查、现场检查、资料查阅及现场询问获取健康监护资料。结果显示两类型企业间职业接害人群、人均防治经费差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),健康监护制度及档案、查体异常项目(如肺部胸片、口腔呼吸道肺部疾病、皮肤病、尿常规等)以及工人上岗前和离岗后职业健康监护差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。提示我省木制家具制造企业工人健康监护状况不容乐观。
20 wood-based furniture manufacturing enterprises in our province were randomly selected. According to the number of employees, they were divided into two types: large (300 persons or more) and small (300 persons or less). The questionnaire survey, on-site inspection, data search and on- Guardianship information. The results showed that there was no significant difference in per capita expenditure on prevention and control among occupational occupations between the two types of enterprises (P> 0.05), health care system and archives, abnormal physical examination items (such as lung chest radiograph, oral respiratory lung disease, , Urine routine, etc.) And occupational health monitoring before and after leaving the post-employment workers were statistically significant (P <0.01). Prompted the province’s wooden furniture manufacturing workers health care status is not optimistic.