三种预处理方法对新生儿奶嘴清洗质量的影响

来源 :中国消毒学杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:sweetacid
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同的预处理方法对新生儿奶嘴清洗质量的影响。方法将临床使用后的奶嘴分成A、B、C 3组,A组用后干燥保存,B组用后浸泡在清水里,C组用后浸泡在洗洁精液体里,由消毒供应中心集中回收清洗,采用目测法和ATP生物荧光检测法观察3种预处理方式对奶嘴清洗质量的影响;对清洗合格后的奶嘴采用压力蒸汽灭菌,抽检采样作微生物培养。结果经裸眼目测和带光源放大镜检测,A、B、C 3组的清洗合格率分别为83.21%、88.03%和93.73%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对3组奶嘴抽样作ATP生物荧光检测的RLU值,无统计学意义(F=3.164,P=0.058);对采样的36份标本经过(36±1)℃培养48 h,结果全部阴性。结论应用洗洁精作为新生儿奶嘴的预处理剂,可以明显降低奶嘴清洗难度,提高奶嘴清洗质量,保证灭菌合格。 Objective To investigate the effect of different pretreatment methods on the quality of neonatal pacifier. Methods The clinical pacifiers were divided into groups A, B and C 3, group A was preserved after use, group B was immersed in clear water, group C was immersed in detergent liquid, and concentratedly recovered by disinfection supply center The effects of three pretreatment methods on the cleaning quality of pacifier were observed by visual inspection and ATP biofluorescence detection. The qualified pacifier was sterilized by pressure steaming and sampled for microbial culture. Results The naked eyes and the magnifying glass with light source detected the clean pass rates of A, B and C groups were 83.21%, 88.03% and 93.73%, respectively, with statistical significance (P <0.05) The RLU value of biofluorescence detection was not statistically significant (F = 3.164, P = 0.058). The 36 samples were cultured at 36 ± 1 ℃ for 48 h, all the results were negative. Conclusion The application of detergent as a preconditioning agent for newborn pacifiers can significantly reduce the difficulty of pacifier cleaning, improve pacifier cleaning quality and ensure the sterilization.
其他文献
近年来,婴幼儿安抚奶嘴的质量问题层出不穷,国外通报召回也时有发生,本文通过梳理国内市场监督抽查情况和国外通报召回案例,对我国安抚奶嘴出现的质量问题进行分析,有针对性
通过对兰州滨水景观现状的调研,并对四十里黄河风情线兰州市区段及其主要景观节点的功能性、连续性、可达性、生态性等方面进行深入剖析,从而发现兰州滨河景观建设上存在的一
从数据的有效性、公式的输入、函数的运用、一些数学及工程测量知识详细地阐述了Excel办公软件在公路工程实践中的应用,指出使用Excel软件能够有效地提高工作效率、准确度,并直
针对农村自然灾害预警现况,提出了由精细化的监测体系、预警产品制作及预警发布体系组成的精细化预警系统,并通过建立严密的管理制度和应急预案体系,从而保障预警系统的有效