Relations between China and the Philippines have been tense since Chinese surveillance vessels intercepted a Philippine naval ship attempting to harass Chinese fishermen near the Huangyan Island, called Huangyan Dao in Chinese, in the South China Sea on April 10.
　　Following the incident, both countries sent more vessels to the area, leading to a persistent standoff. China’s Foreign Ministry summoned a top diplomat of the Philippine Embassy to lodge complaints. While considering the incident the most severe standoff with China in the waters of the South China Sea in recent years, the Philippines relented shortly afterward. Philippine President Benigno Aquino III denied the possibility of a war between the two sides. Philippine Foreign Secretary Albert Del Rosario also stressed the importance of the SinoPhilippine friendship. At the same time, however, Manila declared it would bring the case to the International Court of Justice. These bewildering moves obscured the Philippines’ real motives.
　　Over the past years, the Chinese Government has exercised forbearance on challenges from the Philippines. The Philippines illegally arrested Chinese fishermen and even shot and killed a fisherman near the Huangyan Island in the past. This time, however, Chinese surveillance vessels patrolling nearby defeated Philippine harassment and protected Chinese fishermen. Apparently, the Philippines did not expect China would make such a strong response to safeguard the sovereignty of its territories in the South China Sea.
　　China’s policy
　　China’s policy on safeguarding its marine territories has been undergoing changes. Chinese surveillance vessels have become an important means for securing sovereignty and territorial integrity in the South China Sea, the East China Sea and other areas through regular patrols.
　　For a long time, the Chinese Government has given priority to stability in the South China Sea in a bid to maintain good neighborly relations with other countries in the region. More often than not, China keeps forbearance about violations of international laws and agreements by some countries, and hopes to mitigate tensions through economic cooperation with them. But China’s restraint is regarded as “weakness.” In their view, China won’t take a strong stance on the issue. As a result, a weird situation where small countries bully a big country has appeared in the South China Sea.
　　Among all the disputing countries, the Philippines and Viet Nam are two rampant challengers. China’s tolerance does have a limit. It should not be taken for granted that China will always tolerate provocation.
　　China believes the islands in the South China Sea have been Chinese territories since ancient times. For the Chinese Government and people, violating the historical reality means challenging China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Due to the lack of maritime strength and attention, the Chinese Government failed to make a long-term strategy for the South China Sea following the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949.
　　China now maintains a position in the Nansha Islands, called Nansha Qundao in Chinese, thanks to the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization(UNESCO). In 1987, UNESCO decided to establish a global ocean observing system, including observation stations of worldwide sea levels. China accepted the task of constructing the No. 74 station in the South China Sea, showing that the UN acknowledges China’s sovereignty over the Nansha Islands.
　　Apart from historical records, international agreements following World War II also confirm China’s sovereignty over the South China Sea islands. When World War II ended, the Chinese Government took over these islands from Japanese occupation. But since the 1970s, some Southeast Asian countries have stepped up their efforts to occupy the reefs and islands and explore natural resources, such as oil and gas, in the South China Sea.
　　These countries have recently preferred to use the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea as the main justification for their claims. The convention establishes a 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone for coastal states. In their argument, China has given up these territories since it signed the convention. This is, of course, not true. While ss abiding by the convention, China believes historical facts should also be respected. If the Philippine Government files a lawsuit in the International Court of Justice against China, chances of succeeding are slim given the solid historical evidence and facts in China’s favor.
　　


　　Bilateral solutions
　　Territorial disputes in the South China Sea caused a military conflict between China and Viet Nam in the 1980s. Authorized by the UN in 1987, China carried out a scientific study in the South China Sea. As the Chinese started to build observation facilities on its own islands, Viet Nam sent vessels to disturb the work. The harassment increased, and consequently, an unexpected conflict broke out when Vietnamese soldiers attacked Chinese sailors on the Chigua Reef in March 1988. Although the Vietnamese stopped interfering with observation station construction, they quickened the invasion of other reefs in the South China Sea. To date, Viet Nam has occupied 29 islands in the Nansha Islands.
　　With regard to the current standoff near the Huangyan Island, China will keep a restrained stance and won’t take preemptive measures. However, it will counter if the Philippines provokes further.
　　Some Southeast Asian nations have taken a tough line on the South China Sea in light of both domestic and external factors. In particular, when the United States announced a pivot to the Asia-Pacific region last year, the Philippines and Viet Nam agreed strongly with the United States. They hope to make use of the U.S. strategy.
　　Southeast Asian nations that claim territories in the South China Sea have adopted a two-pronged policy under which they ask for Chinese economic cooperation while seeking a security umbrella from the United States.
　　China is the largest trade partner of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations(ASEAN). Trade with ASEAN set a new record of $362.9 billion in 2011, increasing 24 percent from 2010. During the visit of Philippine President Aquino III to China in 2011, China signed more than $10 billion in contracts with the Philippines. But this president with partial Chinese descent fired harsh rhetoric at China as soon as he flew back to Manila.
　　In the security realm, some Southeast Asian nations would like to cooperate with the United States, including arms purchases and joint military exercises. Though China could use trade and economic leverage to rein in these countries, it has refrained from exerting such means.
　　Patience is always needed to resolve territorial disputes between countries. If they adopt rude attitudes, draw unrelated parties into negotiations, or seek support from a superpower, the disputes will become more complicated. Now, the Philippines should start holding talks with China, instead of going out of its way to solicit U.S. support. Only a bilateral solution will keep the Huangyan Island situation from escalating.
　　Huangyan Island
　　The Huangyan Island in the South China Sea is China’s inherent territory. China has ample jurisprudential evidence supporting its sovereign rights over the island. China was the first to discover and name the Huangyan Island and also the first to include the island into its territory and exercise sovereign jurisdiction over it.
　　The waters surrounding the Huangyan Island have been a traditional fishing ground for Chinese fishermen. Since ancient times, Chinese fishermen have been fishing in waters surrounding the island. China’s National Bureau of Statistics, the China Earthquake Administration and the State Oceanic Administration of China have carried out multiple scientific research programs on the Huangyan Island and its adjacent waters.
　　Prior to 1997, the Philippines had no objection to the Chinese Government’s exercise of sovereign administration, development and exploitation of the Huangyan Island. Instead, it expressed on many occasions that the island is outside the scope of the Philippine territory. On official Philippine maps published in 1981 and 1984, the island is also marked outside Philippine territorial limits.
　　The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea allows coastal states to claim a 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone, but coastal states have no rights to undermine other countries’ inherent territorial sovereignty based on that. Any attempt to change the ownership of territorial sovereignty by using the convention is against international laws as well as the purpose and principle of the convention.