论文部分内容阅读
本研究以公共事务管理架构(PAM)为分析基础,经相关文献得出PAM现象面之经济、社会、政治与行政四个构面及事实判断之潜在18个因素,建构结构方程模式(SEM)影响“服贸协议”认同的事实判断,并运用社会判断理论(SJT)就南台湾民众个体与不同群体分析“服贸协议”之价值判断及人际判断。研究发现,事实判断之四个构面与两岸签署“服贸协议”成正向相关,其影响大小依序为社会、政治、经济、行政。价值判断顺序为社会、行政、经济、政治。人际判断中行政官员顺序为:政治、行政、社会、经济;企业厂商顺序为:社会、经济、行政、政治;一般民众顺序为:经济、行政、社会、政治。
Based on the analysis of the Public Affairs Management Architecture (PAM), this study draws the potential economic, social, political and administrative aspects of the PAM phenomenon and the potential 18 facts of the PAM phenomenon through the relevant literature to construct the structural equation model (SEM) Affect the judgment of “service agreement” and use the social judgment theory (SJT) to analyze the value judgments and interpersonal judgments of individual and groups in South Taiwan. The study finds that the four facets of factual judgment are positively related to the signing of the “trade agreement” between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, and the order of their influence is social, political, economic, and administrative. The order of value judgment is social, administrative, economic and political. Interpersonal judgments in the order of administrative officials: political, administrative, social, economic; business firms order: social, economic, administrative, political; general public order: economic, administrative, social, political.