论文部分内容阅读
在北朝末期记载赐姓信息的墓志中,存在诸多近似甚至相同的“赐姓”书写现象。在墓志的志盖、首题、志传等不同位置,皆有赐姓书写的痕迹。志传部分,“赐姓”并非孤立的文字,与之相关的一些历史信息也被载入了志传中,最为重要的是,诸多墓志在赐姓的书写上呈现相通的指向——赐姓政策。而志盖和首题则承载了赐姓的演变信息,特别是“赐姓”信息从二者之中淡去,昭示着赐姓书写情境已然发生转变。墓志作为一种不同于正史的文本,其记载的内容往往具有现场因素,尤其是墓志作者对赐姓的评价,较能反映当时社会对赐姓的态度,而这即是刻写在墓志中的历史图景之一端。
In the epitaphs in the late Northern Dynasties that recorded the surname information, there are many similar or even identical “surname” writing phenomenon. In the Epitaph Chi, the first question, Zhi Chuan and other different locations, all have surname writing traces. The biography part, “surname ” is not an isolated text, and some related historical information is also included in the biography, the most important is that many epitaphs in surname writing appear to be connected to the point - Favor surname policy. The title and title carry the evolutionary information of surname, especially the information of “surname” faded away from the two, indicating that the situation of surname writing has changed. As a text different from the official history, the epitaphs often contain on-site elements. In particular, the epitaphs’ evaluation of surnames reflects the society’s attitude towards surnames at the time, and this is the history written in the epitaphs One end of the picture.