论文部分内容阅读
日本传统行政法学的方法论被限定于法律解释学,围绕着对“明治宪法”以及明治时期实定行政法的解释,产生了国权学派的日本型概念法学方法论、东京大学学派的价值主义及目的论、京都大学学派的法实证分析方法论、纯粹法学派的纯粹法学方法论、马克思主义学派的法社会学方法论等法律解释方法论之间的争议,争议的结果最终形成了以美浓部达吉、田中二郎为代表的日本传统行政法解释学。但随着“二战”后《日本国宪法》的制定、行政法律制度的重构以及现代公共行政的发展,日本传统的行政法解释学在独立性、统治性、具体性、实践性等方面逐渐显现出其弊端。对此,日本行政法学者们在批判的同时,从不同的视角出发,积极地提出了实务法律解释论、法政策学方法论、法社会学方法论、行政目的(公共性)分析方法论、行政法解释过程论、法律构造解释论等各种所谓的新的行政法解释学方法论,由此推动了日本行政法解释学的发展。
The methodology of Japanese traditional administrative law is limited to legal hermeneutics. Around the interpretation of the Meiji Constitution and the actual administrative law in the Meiji period, the methodology of Japanese conceptual jurisprudence of the nationalist school of thought has emerged. The value doctrine of the Tokyo University School And Skopostheorie, the methodology of the law of empirical analysis of Kyoto University, the pure jurisprudence of pure school of law, and the methodology of legal sociology of Marxist school. , Erlang Tanaka as the representative of Japan’s traditional administrative law hermeneutics. However, with the formulation of the “Constitution of Japan” after World War II, the reconstruction of the administrative legal system, and the development of modern public administration, the traditional Japanese administrative law hermeneutics has its own characteristics of independence, dominance, concreteness, practicality, etc. Gradually show its drawbacks. In this regard, Japanese administrative law scholars actively put forward substantive legal interpretation theory, legal policy methodology, legal sociological methodology, administrative purpose (public) analysis methodology, administrative law interpretation from a different perspective, while criticizing Process theory, the interpretation of the legal structure of the so-called new method of interpretation of administrative law methodology, thus promoting the development of Japanese administrative law hermeneutics.