本文引入了产权规则与责任规则这一法经济学上对权利救济最重要的区分理论,从多个维度对适用不同责任承担方式的可能后果进行了比较分析。在此基础上,指出适用《侵权责任法》第15条可能产生的问题,进而提出对该条可以通过司法解释的方式,提供一些引导性因素来对法官过大的自由裁量权予以限制,并对其具体适用行为加以指引,从而减少适用错误以及适用不一致情况的发生。 This paper introduces the theory of property rights and liability which is the most important distinction theory in law and economics on the right relief and compares and analyzes the possible consequences of applying different modes of responsibility from multiple dimensions. On this basis, it points out the possible problems that apply to Article 15 of Tort Liability Law, and then proposes that this article can provide some guiding factors to restrict the excessive discretion of judges by means of judicial interpretation Guidance on their specific applicable practices, thereby reducing the number of applicable errors and the application of inconsistencies.