论文部分内容阅读
韦伯“中国法”问题是他在建构宏大的社会理论过程中对中国与西方加以比较而形成的。韦伯认为中国法是家产制法律结构,其司法审判是家父长制的,并在私法、自然法观念、法学教育、法律家阶层等方面存在缺陷。后世学者关于韦伯“中国法”理论的争论其实质是对中国传统法律和司法的态度问题和中国法律变革的方向和路径选择的问题。而韦伯“中国法”理论的意义就在于为中国突破当下社会转型和法律变革的瓶颈,在传统与现代之间寻求一条可行路径提供了一种方法论。
Weber’s “China Law” issue was formed by comparing China with the West in the process of building ambitious social theory. Weber believed that Chinese law is the legal structure of the family property system, and its judicial trial is the patriarchal system. In addition, it has defects in private law, the concept of natural law, legal education, lawyer class and so on. The essence of the debate over Weber’s “Chinese law” theory by later scholars is the question of the attitude toward Chinese traditional law and judicature and the direction and choice of the path of Chinese law change. The significance of Weber’s theory of “Chinese law” lies in providing a methodology for China to break through the current bottleneck of social transformation and legal changes and seek a feasible path between tradition and modernity.