最近,我们让学生针对某同学的“鸟飞,得有天空;马跑,得有场地;我们青年人成才,总得有起码的环境与条件吧。”的说法,试以《‘成才’与‘条件’》为题,写一篇议论文。学生列举了革命导师、科学家、文学家不畏艰险、战胜困难,作出杰出贡献的例证,反复说明环境恶劣、条件不好同样可以成才。例证虽典型,但思路不宽阔,认识有偏颇,说理不透辟。为了开拓学生思路,提高学生的说理能力,我们从训练思想方法入手,分五步启发学生思索、讨论:第一步,启发学生运用唯物论的观点思考:成才要不要条件?某同学的说法有没有正确的一面?学生回顾了恩格斯《在马克思 Recently, we asked the students to point out that the students’ “flies to the sky, the horses to run, and the venues; we young people are talented, we must have at least a minimum environment and conditions.” Condition ’’ as a question, write an argumentative paper. The students cited examples of revolutionary tutors, scientists, and literary men who dauntlessly overcome dangers, overcome difficulties, and make outstanding contributions, repeatedly stating that bad conditions and bad conditions can also be successful. Although the illustrations are typical, their ideas are not broad and their understanding is biased. In order to open up student ideas and improve students’ reasoning skills, we start with training ideas and methods to inspire students to think and discuss in five steps: The first step is to inspire students to use materialistic viewpoints to think: do talents require conditions? A student’s statement has Not the right one? The student reviewed Engels in Marx