Comparison of the effect of focused and radial extracorporeal shock waves on spastic equinus in pati

来源 :中华物理医学与康复杂志 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:muyue3122
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Patients were randomly assigned to receive three sessions of either focused or radial shock wave therapy at 1-week intervals. The intensities that were used during focused shock wave therapy (0.12 mJ/mm2) and radial shock wave therapy (2.4 bar) were comparable. The patients were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 4, and 8 weeks after the final shockwave treatment. The primary outcome measure was change of modified Ashworth Scale Score of gastrocnemius muscle. The secondary outcome measures were Tardieu Scale, ankle passive range of motion, dynamic foot contact area and gait speed. A linear mixed model with repeated measures was used to compare each outcome measure between the two groups.

METHODS

Both groups improved significantly in terms of modified Ashworth Scale Score and Tardieu Scale, and no differences were found between the two groups. In terms of ankle passive range of motion and plantar contact area during gait, the radial shock wave therapy yielded a significantly greater improvement than the focused shock wave therapy. No significant changes were observed in gait speed in either group.

RESULTS

Our study suggested that focused and radial shock wave therapy resulted in similar significant improvements in the modified Ashworth scale score and Tardieu scale, but those in the radial shock wave therapy group experienced greater improvements in the ankle passive range of motion and plantar contact area during gait.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that focused and radial shock wave therapy resulted in similar significant improvements in the modified Ashworth scale score and Tardieu scale, but those in the radial shock wave therapy group experienced greater improvements in the ankle passive range of motion and plantar contact area during gait.

其他文献
目的观察低频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)联合高压氧(HBO)治疗卒中后非流利性失语患者的疗效。方法采用随机数字表法将48例脑卒中后非流利性失语患者分为对照组、HBO组及观察组。3组患者均给予常规康复干预(包括药物治疗、语言训练及肢体康复训练等),HBO组患者在此基础上辅以HBO治疗,观察组患者则辅以HBO及低频rTMS联合治疗,磁刺激部位为右侧大脑半球Broca镜像区,磁刺激频率为1 Hz。于治疗前
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEA retrospective single centre cohort analysis was performed to evaluate an individualised radial extracorp oreal shock wave therapy (rESWT) protocol for treatment of symptomati
期刊
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEThis study aims to evaluate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on lower limb spasticity in stroke patients.METHODSTwenty-eight eligible patients with ankle
期刊
目的观察体外冲击波联合骨搬移技术治疗胫腓骨中下段开放性粉碎骨折的疗效。方法将符合Gustilo Ⅲb型胫腓骨粉碎性骨折患者61例采用随机数字表法将分成2组,其中观察组30例,对照组31例。2组均用采用单边外固定支架运用骨搬移技术治疗,观察组于搬移术后第2天进行体外冲击波治疗,隔天治疗1次,5次为1个疗程,隔1个月后行第二个疗程,共治疗2个疗程。2组患者均连续观察24周,记录2组患者骨折愈合的时间和
目的观察交替垂直振动训练对恢复期脑卒中偏瘫患者平衡功能及移动能力的影响。方法采用随机数字表法将符合标准的36例脑卒中偏瘫患者分为试验组(18例)及对照组(18例)。对照组采用常规康复训练,试验组在此基础上加交替垂直振动训练。训练前、训练4周及训练8周后分别采用Berg平衡量表(BBS)评估平衡功能,功能性步态评价表(FGA)评估步行功能及移动能力,采用特异性活动平衡信心量表(ABC)评估活动平衡信
冲击波是波的压力从大气压到达峰值的波前时间为数纳秒、波宽为数微米、压力为上百兆巴的不连续的机械波。体外冲击波治疗已成为治疗许多肌肉骨骼疾病的选择,先后在世界各地获得认可。但目前体外冲击波治疗的临床应用尚缺乏规范的指导方案和深入的科学研究,现组织国内物理医学与康复领域的部分专家,应用循证医学的方法,系统检索临床研究数据,评价证据的质量,讨论并制订肌肉骨骼疾病体外冲击波治疗专家共识,为体外冲击波在国内
目的观察体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)对膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者的下肢功能、安全性及关节软骨的影响。方法将符合纳入标准的63例KOA患者根据治疗方法的不同按随机数字表法分为ESWT组(32例)和对照组(31例)。2组均给予常规膝关节肌力训练,每日3组训练,每组10次,连续训练4周;ESWT组辅以体外冲击波疗法,压力2.5 bar,频率8.0 Hz,频次2000,每周1次,共4次;对照组患者除冲击波压力
目的观察卡伦智能康复系统对痉挛型脑性瘫痪患儿动态平衡功能的影响。方法选择痉挛型双瘫脑性瘫痪患儿24例,按随机数字表法分为试验组和对照组,每组患儿12例。2组患儿均进行常规的康复治疗,主要包括脑瘫肢体训练、作业疗法,电针等,各项目治疗时间均每日1次,每次30 min,连续训练12周。对照组在常规训练的基础上增加传统(非器械)平衡功能训练,每周星期一、三、五各训练1次,每次训练35 min,每周训练3
目的探讨双氯芬酸二乙胺乳胶剂作为耦合剂,体外冲击波(ESW)治疗肩袖损伤患者即时疼痛的疗效。方法选取符合研究标准的64例肩袖损伤患者,采用随机数字表随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组32例,治疗组采用ESW联合双氯芬酸二乙胺乳胶剂耦合剂治疗,对照组采用ESW配合医用超声耦合剂治疗,ESW能量1.2~2.0 Bar,频率10.0 Hz,每次治疗冲击次数6000次,每次治疗时间10 min。每5日治疗1次,
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESpasticity is a common and serious complication following a stroke, and many clinical research have been conducted to evaluate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (
期刊