论文部分内容阅读
春香“闹”学,趣味横生,波澜迭起,到了高潮春香竟毫不客气地缴了陈最良的械,抢荆条投地,让人拍案叫绝。春香的青春率真、大胆泼辣与陈最良的笨拙迂腐形成鲜明对比,师生饶有兴趣地赏析着《闺塾》。这时有位学生提出异议,认为陈最良这个人物有点儿失常,不可信。我微笑着示意他讲具体些。生①:春香再三诨闹,此处更是嘲弄、戏谑老师,而且十分放肆地抢荆条投地,成何体统?简直是反了天!按常理,陈最良应暴跳如雷、严惩不贷才是,可“训
Chun Xiang ”noisy" learning, fun, waves, one after another, to the climax of the spring incense was not gracious to pay the best Chen’s weapons, grabbed the virtuous shot, people slapstick. Chun Xiang’s youthfulness, boldness and boldness are in stark contrast to Chen’s best-looking clumsy decency, and teachers and students appreciate the “Shu” with great interest. At this time, one student objected to the idea that Chen Zheliang was a bit abnormal and not credible. I smiled and showed him to be specific. Student 1: Chun Xiang is noisy and noisy. It is even more a mockery and joking teacher. It is also very unrestrained in grabbing the virtuous shot and making it into a system. It is simply anti-heralding! According to common sense, Chen Zuiliang should be thunderous and punishable without credit. Can train